Reagent-based treatment of domestic wastewater for ammonium removal in decentralized Arctic settlements
https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2025-1-67-80
EDN: QMMCRA
Abstract
Decentralized Arctic settlements are equipped with modern water supply systems, yet they increasingly face the challenge of collecting and treating domestic wastewater. The study examined physical and chemical methods for treating domestic wastewater, similar in composition to wastewater from small northern settlements, with the goal of replacing the often inefficient biological treatment step, especially for organic substances. Wastewater samples at normal (18–22 °С) and extreme (3–6 °С) temperatures were treated in the laboratory using various technological schemes. As a result, the authors propose the most effective technological scheme for treating domestic wastewater in remote Arctic settlements, which includes the following stages: pre-aeration, sedimentation with coagulation and flocculation, chemical oxidation and struvite precipitation, and mechanical and sorption filtration. It was found that this technology is largely independent of water temperature and suitable for domestic wastewater with temperatures ranging from 3 to 22 °С. The implementation of this scheme reduced the concentration of ammonium ions by 96.5 %, suspended solids by 98 %, and chemical oxygen demand by 91 %. The proposed wastewater treatment scheme will simplify the operation of treatment plants in challenging Arctic conditions and enable their operation in automatic mode.
About the Authors
A. M. FugaevaRussian Federation
Anastasiia M. Fugaeva, Assistant in the Department of Engineering Systems and Structures
Tyumen
E. I. Vialkova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Vialkova, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Systems and Structures
Tyumen
References
1. Vialkova E. I., Maksimova S. V., Zemlyanova M. V., Vorotnikova A. V., Maksimov L. I. Drainage of infrastructure facilities of oil and gas fields in Western Siberia. Tyumen: Industrial University of Tyumen; 2017. (In Russ.)
2. Rufova A. A., Tatarinova A. V. Anthropogenous influence on the hydrochemical and hydrobiological condition of the surface water of the northern cities (on the example of Yakutsk). Modern problems of science and education. 2015;(4):503. (In Russ.) URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20468.
3. Fugaeva A. M.,Voronov A. A.,Vialkova E. I. Purification of domestic wastewater fromsmall settlements. In: Sovremennyye problemy zemel'no-imushchestvennykh otnosheniy, urbanizatsii territorii i formirovaniya komfortnoy gorodskoy sredy: sbornik dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Tyumen, 2023 = Modern problems of land and property relations, urbanization of the territory and the formation of a comfortable urban environment: Collection of reports of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tyumen, 2023. Tyumen: Industrial University of Tyumen; 2023. P. 443–450. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=55923907.
4. Lobanov S. A., Poilov V. Z. Treatment of wastewater to remove ammonium ions by precipitation. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. 2006;79(9):1473–1477. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427206090151
5. Mitani Y., Sakai Y., Mishina F., Ishiduka S. Struvite recovery from wastewater having low phosphate concentration. Journal of Water and Environment Technology. 2003;1(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.2003.13
6. Sea Y. F., Chua A. S. M., Ngoh G. Ch., Rabuni M. F. Integrated struvite precipitation and fenton oxidation for nutrient recovery and refractory organic removal in palm oil mill effluent. Water. 2024;16(13):1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ w16131788
7. Glushchenko E., Vialkova E., Sidorenko O., Fugaeva A. Physical-chemical wastewater treatment in Arctic conditions. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020;157:02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015702014
8. Hendriksen K., Hoffmann B. Greenlandic water and sanitation systems – identifying system constellation and challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(33):32964–32974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9556-6
9. Mochalov I. P. Wastewater treatment and disinfection for small settlements (in the Far North). 2nd edition, revised. Moscow: DAR/VODGEO; 2016. (In Russ.)
10. Zvereva S. M., Bartova L. V. Developing wastewater treatment technologies for small agglomerations. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Construction and Architecture. 2017;8(2):64–74. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9826/2017.2.06
11. Grishin B. M., Koshev A. N., Laskov N. N., Bikunova M. V. Azot compounds removal out of sewage using oxidizers. Regional Architecture and Engineering. 2013;(2):91–97. (In Russ.)
12. Andreev S. Yu., Isaeva A. M., Kochergin A. S. Development and investigation of combined wastewater treatment technology for small settlements. Penza: Penza State University of Architecture and Construction; 2015. (In Russ.)
13. Ragush C., Schmidt J., Krkošek W. H., Gagnon G. A., Hansen L. T., Jamieson R. Performance of municipal waste stabilization ponds in the Canadian Arctic. Ecological Engineering. 2015;83(12):413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.008
14. Koivunen J., Heinonen-Tanski H. Peracetic acid (PAA) disinfection of primary, secondary and tertiary treated municipal wastewaters. Water Research. 2005;39(18):4445–4453 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.016
15. Chhetri R. K., Klupsch E., Andersen H. R., Jensen P. E. Treatment of Arctic wastewater by chemical coagulation, UV and peracetic acid disinfection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:32851–32859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8585-5
16. Wu T., Englehardt J. D., Guo T., Gassie L. W., Dotson A. D. Applicability of energy-positive net-zero water management in Alaska: technology status and case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:33025–33037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0743-2
17. Vialkova E. I., Glushchenko E. S., Velizhanina T. S., Osipova E. Y. Analysis of physicochemical wastewater treatment in Arctic zones. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2020;22(1):152–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2020-22-1-152-163
18. Lado Ribeiro A. R., Rodríguez-Chueca J., Giannakis S. Urban and industrial wastewater disinfection and decontamination by advanced oxidation processes (AOPs): Current issues and future trends. Water. 2021;13(4):560. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13040560
19. Nebukina I. A., Smirnova N. N., Rvachev I. S. The effect of organic compounds on removal efficiency of ammonium ions from wastewater by oxidation method. Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V. I. Vernadskogo. 2015;(2):28–33. https://doi.org/10.17277/voprosy.2015.02.pp.028-033
20. Anusuyadevi P. R., Kumar D. Ja. P., Omkaara Jyothi A. D. H. V., Patwardhan N. S., Janani V., Mol A. Towards viable ecofriendly local treatment of blackwater in sparsely populated regions. Water. 2023;15(3):542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030542
21. Barros A., Vecino X., Reig M., Cortina J. L. Coagulation and flocculation optimization process applied to the sidestream of an urban wastewater treatment plant. Water. 2022;14(24):4024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244024
22. Muscarella S. M., Laudicina V. A., Badalucco L., Conte P., Mannina G. Ammonium recovery from synthetic wastewaters by using zeolitic mixtures: a desorption batch-study. Water. 2023;15(19):3479. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193479
Review
For citations:
Fugaeva A.M., Vialkova E.I. Reagent-based treatment of domestic wastewater for ammonium removal in decentralized Arctic settlements. Architecture, Construction, Transport. 2025;5(1):67-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2025-1-67-80. EDN: QMMCRA