Semantics of turquoise dome in architectural landscape of NurSultan
https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2021-3-6-12
Abstract
The article reveals the semantic role of the architectural landscape of the capital in the process of searching for national identity and self-determination on the example of the new capital of Kazakhstan – Nur-Sultan. The genesis of the semantic code of the architectural element is determined – the turquoise dome, the features of its work in the structure of the semantic framework of the architectural environment of Nur-Sultan are analyzed. The author presents her own interpretation of the blue dome symbol as a phenomenon of the new Kazakh cultural and ideological paradigm.
About the Author
О. A. Ivanova
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Ivanova, Associate Professor at the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning
Tyumen
References
1. Doroshenko, D. A. (2018). Architecture of Kazakhstan: traditions and contemporaneity. Kul'turnoe nasledie Sibiri, 2 (26), pp. 86-94. (In Russian)
2. Kozbagarova, N. Zh. (2010). Razvitie landshaftnoy arkhitektury Kazakhstana XX veka. Avtoref. diss. ... dok. arkh. Almaty, 43 p. (In Russian).
3. Kocheridi, A. U., & Kuspangaliyev, B. U. (2018). Features of formation of the landscape environment in large cities of Kazakhstan (on an example of Almaty). Tvorchestvo i sovremennost', 4(8), pp. 60-68. (In Russian).
4. Popovtseva, A. Yu. (2016). National traditions in modern architecture of Kazakhstan. Dizayn i khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo: teoriya, metodika i praktika: Materialy I mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, October 14-15, 2016. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design Publ., pp. 404-410. (In Russian).
5. Koch, N. (2010). The monumental and the miniature: imagining "modernity" in Astana. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(8), pp. 769-787. (In English). DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2010.521854
6. Gaewecki, M. (2013). New Urbanization of the Steppe. Astana: A Capital Called the Capital. Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, (31), pp. 35-56. (In English). DOI:10.2478/sho-2013-0003.
7. Koch, N., & Valiyev, A. (2015). Urban boosterism in closed contexts: spectacular urbanization and second-tier mega-events in three Caspian capitals. Eurasian geography and economics, 56(5), pp. 575598. (In English). DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1146621
8. Nazarbaev, N. A. (2005). V serdtse Evrazii. Astana, Atamura Publ., 192 p. (In Russian).
9. Anacker, S. (2004). Geographies of Power in Nazarbayev’s Astana. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(7), pp. 515-533. (In English). DOI: 10.2747/1538-7216.45.7.515
10. Glaudinov, B. A. (1999). Istoriya arkhitektury Kazakhstana. Almaty: KazGASA «Aikos» Publ., 295 p. (In Russian)
11. Kokumbaeva, B. D., & Kurmangalieva, M. S. (2017). Tengrianskiy tip kul'tury v kontekste sotsiokul'turnoy dinamiki (na kazakhskom materiale). Tengrianstvo i epicheskoe nasledie narodov Evrazii: istoki i sovremennost': Sbornik statey VI-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, June 14– 16. Astana, TOO «Master Po» Publ., pp. 193-198. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Ivanova О.A. Semantics of turquoise dome in architectural landscape of NurSultan. Architecture, Construction, Transport. 2021;(3):6-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2021-3-6-12
Views:
23
Email this article 