Assessment of engineering geological survey quality in Tyumen based on the laboratory soil sample analysis
https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2024-3-44-53
Abstract
Carrying out engineering geological surveys is a complex and responsible process. The reliability and safety of design solutions depend on the quality of their execution. This study assessed the quality of laboratory soil samples based on reports from engineering geological surveys conducted in Tyumen city and Tyumensky district. The assessment was based on 13 reports from 9 survey organizations. The Terzaghi and Lunne methods were used for evaluation. To achieve this, data from compression tests on soil samples, obtained from 505 reports, was processed accordingly. The data were presented as diagrams: for the sample as a whole; by organizations; by type and consistency of soil; by depth of sampling. The study concluded that the quality of the surveys was inadequate and identified factors contributing to this. The study provided recommendations for improving the quality of soil samples collected during engineering geological surveys.
About the Authors
R. V. Melnikov
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Melnikov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Production
Tyumen
Z. A. Kosinova
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zlata A. Kosinova, Graduate Student in the Department of Construction Production
Tyumen
D. V. Rachkov
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Rachkov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Production
Tyumen
References
1. Nicoletti J. V. M., Franchi M. R. A., Motomiya A. V. de A., Motomiya W. R., Molin J. P. Efficiency and quality of soil sampling according to a sampling tool. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2023;27(6):480– 486. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/AGRIAMBI.V27N6P480-486
2. Kropotkin M. P., Fomenko I. K. Engineering-geological surveys in Russia today: problems of regulatory technical documentation, expertise, and quality control. Engineering Survey. 2021;15(5-6):8–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25296/1997-8650-2021-15-5-6-8-23
3. Hiroyuki Tanaka, Pankaj Sharma, Takashi Tsuchida, Masanori Tanaka. Comparative Study on Sample Quality Using Several Types of Samplers. Soils and Foundations. 1996:36(2):57–68. https://doi.org/10.3208/SANDF.36.2_57
4. Tychina N. I. Investigations of the influence of designs of soil carriers and methods of their immersion on the properties of soils in monoliths, selected from boreholes. Moscow: PNIIIS; 1971. (In Russ.)
5. Mabit L., Fulajtar E., Toloza A., Ochoa V., Maestroni B. Implementation and Optimization of Soil Sampling: Some Practical Guidance and Considerations. In: Integrated Analytical Approaches for Pesticide Management. 2018. P. 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816155-5.00004-X
6. Terzaghi K., Peck Ralph B., Mesri G. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. 592 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/soil-mechanicsin-engineering-practice-1996-by-karl-terzaghi-ralph-b.-peck-gholamreza-mesri/page/n1/mode/2up.
7. Lunne T., Berre T., Strandvik S. Sample disturbance effects in soft low plastic Norwegian clay. Symposium on Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics. 1997. P. 81–102. Available at: https://trid.trb.org/View/476476.
8. Vasenin V. A. Evaluation of disturbed parameters of the natural structure of the laboratory samples of clay deposits during engineering and geological surveys in Saint Petersburg territory and nearest areas. Inzhenernaya Geologiya. 2018;XIII(6):48–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25296/1993-5056-2018-13-6-48-65
9. Lacasse S., Berre T., Lefebvre G. Block sampling of sensitive clays. In: 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (San Francisco). 1985. P. 887–892. Available at: https://www.issmge.org/publications/publication/block-sampling-of-sensitive-clays.
10. Yushkov I., Gluschenko Ye. Development of a drilling tool with a removable core-sampler for engineeringgeological drilling. Naukovі pratsі Donets'kogo natsіonal'nogo tekhnіchnogo unіversitetu. Serіya: Gіrnichogeologіchna. 212;2(17):117–126. (In Ukr.) Available at: http://ea.donntu.ru:8080/bitstream/123456789/29030/1/Npdntu_gg_2012_2_21.pdf.
11. Iovlev G. A., Piscunov N. S., Bahvalov E. D., Ochkurov V. I. Optimizing nonlinear soil body models for geotechnical conditions of Saint-Petersburg. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (Scientific and Technical Journal). 2022;7:148–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_7_0_148
12. Khachatryan V. A. Quality of engineering-geological surveys and peculiarities of modern geotechnical calculations. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2016;(5-1):110–114. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26100659_95011880.pdf.
13. Pronozin Ya. A., Malyshkin A. P., Naumkina Yu. V., Epifantsev L. R., Mel'nikov R. V., Poroshin O. S. et al. Tyumen Geotechnics. Science and innovations. Tyumen: Industrial university of Tyumen; 2024. (In Russ.)
14. Priss O.G, Dimitryuk J. S.Quality control of engineering surveys is a guarantee of trouble – free operation of the facility. Engineering Journal of Don. 2023;(1):516–532. (In Russ.) Available at: http://ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n1y2023/8173.
15. Makarychev K.V., Anzhaurova K.S. Accidents of buildings and structures caused by errors in engineering surveys. Electronic scientific & practical journal "Modern scientific researches and innovations". 2020;6. (In Russ.) Available at: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2020/06/92683.
16. Stepanov M. A., Maltseva T. V., Kraev A. N., Bartholomew L. A., Karaulov A. M. Elimination of the progressive development of uneven sedimentation of a multi-storey residential house on tape pile foundations. Naukovedenie. 2017;9(4). (In Russ.) Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/62TVN417.pdf.
17.
Review
For citations:
Melnikov R.V., Kosinova Z.A., Rachkov D.V. Assessment of engineering geological survey quality in Tyumen based on the laboratory soil sample analysis. Architecture, Construction, Transport. 2024;(3):44-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2024-3-44-53
Views:
23
Email this article 